Sunday, July 1, 2012

We interrupt this stupid fairy tale with some facts……..

A guest post by anonnermus:

There is this stupid post popping up all over Facebook . It has the ignorant (late) comedian, George Carlin (who by the way, now knows that atheism is not all it’s cracked up to be) spewing his little diatribe about how Conservatives don’t care for children after they are born. (yes, he is offensive)

Now there is enough ignorant ranting in this nine minute segment to sink a ship, but I’m just going to focus on the attack on Conservatives for not being concerned with children, or charitable (you will note, that every solution to the problem he listed as good, was government sponsored, which = cost to taxpayers, which is statistically shown to inhibit personal contribution to charity). At any rate, this is an oft used argument by the radical, okay-with-baby-killing, “pro-choice” crowd. For some reason, they would like us to believe that guaranteeing mothers the legal right to kill their offspring is a benevolent and charitable act that will spare someone else pain and suffering, and they would dearly love ‘everyone else’ (who ever that is), to pay for those abortions. A good parenting choice, you know. Yeah, sure…….every time I run into financial trouble, adverse life events, etc., the first parenting choice that comes to mind is to kill one of my kids…..yep….

But I digress……

Here are a few stats for you liberal, brainless, AND UNCHARITABLE people, whose best solution to poverty is to doggedly promote feticide, and doggedly push for a nanny state, cradle to grave welfare system, because apparently it is YOU all who don’t want to care for babies after they are born. These statistics are from research by, and published in a book written by Arthur C. Brooks (an independent, by the way), a professor at Syracuse University.

And just as a shout out to you poor ignorant atheists who doggedly cry “persecution!!!” but spend most of your time heaping persecution on Christians – and since George Carlin was a self-proclaimed atheist, I thought this paragraph was of particular interest:

“The single biggest predictor of someone's altruism, Willett says, is religion. It increasingly correlates with conservative political affiliations because, as Brooks' book says, "the percentage of self-described Democrats who say they have 'no religion' has more than quadrupled since the early 1970s." America is largely divided between religious givers and secular nongivers, and the former are disproportionately conservative. One demonstration that religion is a strong determinant of charitable behavior is that the least charitable cohort is a relatively small one -- secular conservatives.” (bold, underlined, italics are mine)

So…….once again we find the pro-baby-killers spewing the mindless, unsubstantiated drivel of the radical zealot. Mind numbed, kool-aide drinking folks who get their talking points from the hierarchy driving the abortion industry, i.e. the profiteers, without even realizing it. - people on the wrong side of a cause that uses them as (to co-opt a phrase by a well-known and charitable radio talk show host) ‘mind -numbed robots’. The fact of the matter is religious conservatives shell more of their personal money out to benefit the impoverished than wealthy liberals, or any liberal for that matter. Period. Full stop. End of discussion.

Let me leave you with this excellent quote by Texas State Supreme Court Justice Willett, in case you didn’t bother to read the article:

"The belief that liberals care more about the poor may scratch a partisan or ideological itch, but the facts are hostile witnesses."

I know that you would all like to believe that Christian, conservative, pro-life people don’t care about children who are in poverty……...and George Carlin would probably like some iced - water………….

No comments:

Post a Comment