Sunday, April 22, 2012

Planned Parenthood SEX and ABORTION

I just read a post on Ms. blog where an 'older lady' (Shirley Grant) 'tells off a congressman', you can see the video at the link.  First of all, she didn't tell the congressman off.  What she did do was politely voice her daughters opinion; she parroted what her daughter told her about Planned Parenthood and birth control.
My daughter says, “Throw out the word ‘birth control,’ Mom. Planned Parenthood isn’t that.” She says it is for hormone replacement, and that means you use those pills for many, many, many different areas of women’s lives. I find it very offensive that men think they can tell women what to do with their own life. I think the political arena is making a big mistake when they don’t work with Planned Parenthood, instead of against it. They do so many good things.
Of course Planned Parenthood is about birth control.  What would be the point otherwise? Ms. Shirley said Planned Parenthood is about prevention.  I can't argue with that.  They do make an impact in preventing pregnancy, and sexually transmitted infections.  But their main income is in preventing unborn babies, from being born alive.  Their main income is from killing babies in utero.  Their main income is abortion.  Why would anyone support an organization that gets it main income (or any portion of it) from killing babies?

Ms. Shirley's been duped into thinking Planned Parenthood is all about women's health.  They're not!  They are about promoting the sexualization of young people, and then supposedly preventing diseases and pregnancy, both caused from sex, and preventing live babies from being born, who were created from that same sex.  Planned Parenthood is about SEX!!! 

Sunday, April 15, 2012

#ProChoice Mentality is Selfish Mentality

Thank God most mother's don't think this way.  image

Would you defend women who kill their 2 year olds so they may live the life they choose?  It's really no different.  A baby deserves it's mother's protection at ANY stage of development.

The Car Seat and The Womb

Did you see the New York Post Op-Ed by Susan Heath, "No One Called Me a Slut"?  Nothing like riding the Sandra Fluke wave after Rush Limbaugh referred to her as a slut.  Ms. Heath's article has absolutely nothing to do with birth control coverage.  It's like comparing apples and oranges, but whatever, you want people to read your op-ed, you give it a catchy title.

It’s 1978, five years after Roe v. Wade. I’m 38, I have four sons — the oldest is 17, the youngest is turning 12. I’m at school, getting a B.A., and I’m loving it.

I’m about two and a half months pregnant.

I don’t want this child.

So let's cut to the chase here.  Susan killed her baby, so she could continue her education.  It's really that simple.

Speaking of the abortion procedure itself, Susan says:

It’s really not so bad; in fact it’s not as invasive as going for monthly checkups when you’re pregnant.

Maybe it's just me, but this looks to be incredibly more invasive than a pre-natal examination. Your cervix is forced open, and you have a suction cannula 'gently' forced through the opening,  Then your baby is sucked out, piece by piece.  Then a currette is 'gently' forced through the open cervix, and the remaining 'products of conception' are scraped out.  Not invasive? image

Two years later, I’m driving upstate by myself. I look down and think that if I hadn’t had the abortion, there would be a baby seat next to me with a small child in it, resting comfortably, knowing it would always be safe because I was in charge.

Yes, there would have been a little boy or girl, safely tucked in the car seat, much like he or she was safely tucked in your womb.  You would give your life for that baby nestled safely in the car seat, yet you took that baby's life when it was nestled in your womb.

The difference between the baby in the womb, and the baby in the car seat, is that you can see one, and not the other.  It's the same baby, at a different stage of development.  When pro-choice women admit that to themselves and others, abortion will be looked at for what it is.  Killing for convenience.

Saturday, March 31, 2012

What Does Being Pro-Choice Really Mean?

Sometimes I wonder if young pro-choicer's have thought about what they advocate.  So when I saw the tweet below, by a pro-lifer, I thought I would address this question.  What does being pro-choice mean?  image

Seasoned pro-choicer's will tell you they advocate all choices, which include the choice to birth, to adopt, to parent, and so on.  But the #1 choice they fight for, is to the choice to abort... legally.  The #1 choice they fight to retain, is the legal option to kill their unborn child.  What kind of nation have we become when women think killing their unborn babies is a way to be equal?

The message of feminism has gotten lost.  Young feminists today have no idea what real oppression is, only of what they perceive it to be.  They should be fighting for those things that define us as women.  Being allowed to give your baby his/her birthday is a good place to start.  Yet they fight to retain the legal right to kill their babies, so they can be equal?  It just makes no sense.

So young feminists, this is directed at you.  Do you know what you advocate?  Do you realize that by being pro-choice, you are advocating for the right for women to have their babies slaughtered?  Don't you think women deserve to have their babies, and have a life too?  I certainly do.  Women deserve better than abortion.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Susan G Komen Should Just Stop Funding Planned Parenthood

(Reuters) - U.S. breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure is feeling a pinch on donations following a controversy over its funding for Planned Parenthood, a leading provider of birth-control and abortion services.

Read the rest here

Hopefully, you find this news exiting, because this is what we've been waiting for!  It's not just about Susan G. Komen, or about Planned Parenthood.  It's about the pro-life message getting out, FINALLY!!!  People are listening, and they are reacting.  No longer are they closing their eyes to the 1.3 million unborn babies killed in the United States each year.  They know!  And with an open mind, and an open heart, they're reacting. 

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Regulations in Texas Abortion Industry Effective at Reducing Late Term Abortions

I read an article in Big Think "The Economics of Second Trimester Abortions: Market Supply".  I read the entire article, but came back to this, the very first paragraph.  This is what we pro-lifers work towards.  Less babies being killed by abortion, and given a chance at life.

New research finds that government regulations that restrict the supply of abortions performed after 15 weeks gestation in the state of Texas increased the price of late abortions by 37% ($454) and lead to an increase in the number of unintended births by over 6,600 in the three years following the implementation of the regulation.

The jist of the article is that regulations on the abortion industry in Texas, have adversely affected the price of late-term abortions, causing less women to have them. 

What this means to me, is that an average of 2,200 more babies a year, avoid being slaughtered by an abortionist.  This... is something I can live with.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Pro-Life Rally gets Rowdy - Bloomington, IN.

Scott, a pro-life warrior, sent this to me via email.

First, an article in the Indiana Daily Student.

“Stop Abortion Now.”
“It’s a Child Not a Choice.
”Men, women and families shivered in the icy cold, but they held their signs high to protest against abortion on the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
On Sunday afternoon, the 2012 Rally for Life took place on the Monroe County Courthouse lawn, its 20th year. This year, the protest attracted more pro-choice advocates than ever before to counter those who were pro-life.
“This is one of the biggest anti-life crowds I’ve seen,” said Andrew Henry, a pro-life activist who attended with his daughter and pregnant wife. “I had a couple of guys say things I’d never repeat. Oftentimes, they are very rude and impolite while we are here very calmly, peacefully.”

Well yeah, rude would be a good word for them.

Scott documented some of the, uh, conversation. I have to warn you, there is a wee bit of Foul language in it. Many thanks for this timely information!