Sunday, July 17, 2011

"Abortion Gang" was over the top this week

Pro-abort members of "Abortion Gang", posted some real doozies this week. 

#1 - Christie posted 'We Are Not Baby-Haters", in a sad attempt to justify killing human fetuses.  Apparently, Rush Limbaugh equated Caylee Anthony's murder to abortion.  Abortion advocates, for the most part, support abortion at any stage in pregnancy, and for any reason.  They reserve the right to evict a fetus from their womb, even if the baby was wanted in the first place.  For Rush, it's a matter of withdrawing your consent for your child to live, whether in the womb, or already born.  It's not only Rush that feels that way.  As I began writing this post, I popped over to twitter and saw this:image

Clearly, the tweet shows that people other than Rush, equate mother's killing their born children, with mother's killing their unborn children.  It is the same, it's just at a different stage of development.

Christie ended her post with this remarkable comment, and I want to share with you. 

Kids are awesome, when you’re ready for them. I feel like I will be a better mother because I will have children when I am ready to be a mom. I truly think that having had my abortion has made me a kinder, more understanding, less judgmental person. And I will be a better mom for it… eventually.Right now, I’m just psyched that my best friend is having a baby that I get to play with, cuddle and love, and then give back when she gets fussy. That’s one of the joys of not having kids yet, and waiting until you’re ready (no matter how you get there).

Christie doesn't seem to understand that the baby she aborted, will never be replaced. He/she was a unique individual, and is gone forever due to the abortion.  Oh, and her friend who was in labor at the time of the post?  She had 2 abortions prior to having this 'wanted' baby.  I have no doubt that both Christie, and her bestie, will be good mothers.  It's just sad their first babies had to pay the ultimate price, so they could complete their own childhood.

#2 - ProChoiceGal penned "Why YOU Should Be An Abortion Provider".  Yes, she is attempting to recruit people to be abortionists. 

Let’s face it: providing abortions is not the most popular job that a person can choose. Even among the pro-choice medical community, providing abortions is not something that you do; it’s something that you let other people do. I can understand why, too. People don’t generally go to medical school with expectations of being protested, harassed, and threatened when they finish their schooling and get a job. People don’t usually expect to have the simple question of “what is your job?” to sometimes have to be an awkward, nerve wrecking experience. With all of this, some people may wonder why anyone would want to become an abortion provider.

No, being an abortionist wouldn't be a popular job, considering most people who go to medical school, do so to save lives, not end them.  For those that do, It's an extremely lucrative business.  The less competition, the more lucrative.  Hopefully, ProChoiceGal will find that ripping human fetuses to shreds, isn't her calling after all.   Although, I fear that the money will out-weigh her conscience. 

Remember Dr. Tiller?  He took great pride in ending pregnancies for 'women in need'.  He killed viable babies, some of which were completely normal and healthy.  As sad as it is, that is the legacy ProChoiceGal wants to live up to.

#3 - Steph Herald wrote "Letting Antis Speak for Themselves".  As most of us know, Steph is the head honcho at Abortion Gang.  She censors the blog with an iron delete button. She doesn't believe is free speech, and is unwilling, even unable, to debate pro-lifer's.  Nor does she want to subject her 'subjects' to comments that may well open their eyes to the reality of what abortion is. 

A couple of the comments she highlighted, were intended for the "Why YOU Should Be An Abortion Provider" post.  Of course, Steph didn't want to subject her 'subject', ProChoiceGal, to debate.

“My mission today is not to get you to change your major…” So I guess abortion providers’ major would be Murder 101?  “However, maybe you have it in your heart to become an abortion provider.” Have it in your HEART?! Are you F*****G kidding me?! A person has NO HEART if they murder a baby. F******g disgusting and vile. It’s one thing to have stupid thoughts but to speak them and then POST ON THE INTERNET for the world to see?! I’m at a loss, I really want to meet this ‘provider’. F******g idiot. (edited for language content)

I'm glad Steph posted this one.  Indeed, how can anyone with a heart, consider ripping out the heart of another?  It does anger pro-lifer's when someone speaks so casually, and proudly, about their career choice of ripping apart human fetuses.

Another comment:

Excuse the caps please. NO DOCTOR SHOULD BE PERFORMING ABORTIONS PERIOD! THE PURPOSE OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION IS TO HEAL PEOPLE, NOT TO KILL. EVERYONE PRO ABORTION OR PRO LIFE MUST AGREE ON ONE THING. WHETHER YOU CALL IT A CLUMP OF CELLS OR A BABY IT IS STILL SOMETHING LIVING AND EVOLVING TO AN EVENTUAL BIRTH OF A HUMAN BEING. AN ABORTION ABORTS OR EXTERMINATES THIS LIFE. THIS IS CONTRARY TO WHY THE MEDICAL PROFESSION EXISTS IN THE FIRST PLACE………..

Indeed!

It surprises me when she does let a pro-life comment slip through.  Like this one from the baby hater post.

Upstatemama:

Okay, I am pro-life and I believe abortion is murder. I say that not to start the debate about it but to let you all know where I am coming from. That said I don’t hate you for your opinion. Nor do I think your opinion makes you a bad person. There are people who do not like babies and children on both sides of this debate. I mean I get the point that was being made. To many people, myself included, Caylee Anthony’s murder is the same tragic as those sweet babies who die everyday by abortion. However, I think that accusing people of being hartless monsters (which is what Mr Limbaugh said essentially) is just pointless. It does not make your point in a clear cocncise way. All it does is serve to fan the flames of hatred that just don’t need fanning.

"To many people, myself included, Caylee Anthony’s murder is the same tragic as those sweet babies who die everyday by abortion." - Isn't that what Rush said?  Clearly, the comment was 'let in', because it contained an anti-Rush element to it.  What did Rush really say?

"You know, what I don't understand about it is they're [the media] all card-carrying liberals. When does the death of a child bother them? I've never seen them get so upset over the death of a child," Rush Limbaugh said about the Casey Anthony verdict in his monologue on Wednesday.
"If the child had died, what, two years earlier in the womb this woman would be a star. She'd be a hero. And folks, I don't think that is a cliche to say. And I don't think it is as cheap attempt at humor. I think that while it may be uncomfortable to hear -- one of the reasons it is uncomfortable to hear is that there is an element of truth in it," Limbaugh added.
Rush told the media if they want to feel better, they should imagine that Casey Anthony had an abortion instead:
"You people in the media, if you really, really think she is guilty and you want to feel better about this just tell yourselves that she waited a couple of years to get an abortion and then you'll feel better."
"Abortion is brutal, [it's] never characterized that way and the reason it is brutal is because there is an element of truth of it. I just wanted to put it out there. Pure and simple, nothing more."

I would like to conclude this post by sincerely thanking Abortion Gang for making my job so easy.

5 comments:

  1. Steph probably knows me well. You'll notice zero comments under July 17th, "legally allowed ...". I was not impolite, I merely pointed out that sonographers at CPC's must be certified in Limited OB ultrasound, and asked why, if a sonographer could "eke" out an image that convinced a mother that there in fact IS a human being in 'there', why do they get so upset when she doesn't kill said human being? It's creepy the way they become enraged when a mother chooses not to kill her baby. I ended my comment by pointing out that some things are legal in this country that are much worse than what the author considers "lying".



    Interesting, that she conveniently discarded the truth in a post castigating pro lifers for lying.

    ReplyDelete
  2. .....oh, BTW - guess whose comment didn't make it past Steph's censor button?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon - They don't want word to get out that it IS a human being in the womb. If they just took a peek, they would see a miniature baby.

    CPC's aren't 'medical clinics', and are not there to give women medical advice. They are there to help women take the crisis out of their pregnancy, without killing the baby in the process. If a woman sees her baby, she is more likely to bring it to term, which frankly, scares the hell out of pro-aborts.

    If know one else sees your comments, be assured that Steph Herald does. She probably won't share it with her subjects, but you'll know you said what needed to be said.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous said: Interesting, that she conveniently discarded the truth in a post castigating pro lifers for lying.

    Actually, that doesn't surprise me at all. Some of the worst liars I've come across are the very ones who point fingers, while jumping up and down screaming about someone else's supposed "lies."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cecilia - Roe v Wade was based on lies. The entire pro-choice argument is built on lies.. Can we expect any different from pro-aborts? What they don't lie about, they deny, or hide.

    ReplyDelete