Lately, and perhaps a lot longer than I'm aware of, pro-aborts are attempting to re-define the term abortion.
When a pregnant woman loses her baby through no fault of her own, it is commonly thought of as a miscarriage, though the term 'spontaneous abortion' is medically accurate for this event.
The term 'abortion' is commonly thought of as intentional, an 'induced abortion', but pro-choice feminists are trying to change that. This is of course in an effort to make abortion 'normal and acceptable', unlike the intentional killing that it is.
When pro-choice feminists refer to someone who has had a miscarriage, they will no doubt include their knowledge that the woman had an 'abortion procedure'. Get it? If a D&C was performed because of a miscarriage, then according to pro-aborts, the woman had an abortion procedure. The woman has lost her baby spontaneously, but the fems are linking that with induced abortion. Anything for the cause, heh? What of the millions of women that have/had D&C's that weren't pregnant? I think I know the answer.
For the sake of understandable debate, let's leave the terms alone. Miscarriage is spontaneous and unintentional, an act of nature. Abortion is intentional and deliberate, an act by women and abortion providers to destroy the fetus.
I posted an article this morning about the blatant lies of pro-aborts, regarding Rick Santorum and his wife Karen. The comments on that article, and the screenshots of various choicer's, validate my claims here.
As I stated in my last comment on that post(June 18, 2011 12:44 PM ), by pro-choice logic, a woman who gives birth to a full term baby, has had an abortion. After all, the pregnancy was terminated wasn't it?