Because this is an opinion letter, and will probably be deleted soon, I am posting it in it’s entirety.
From the Pueblo Chieftain
Letters: Roe v. Wade
Since so many in Washington would like to cancel Roe v. Wade, I would like to know what their logic is. Any girl or woman should be allowed the morning-after pill as soon as possible if they have been raped or coerced into having sex.
I have wondered for many years how men would feel if they were rape victims and they could get pregnant. Could they handle carrying a child for nine months?
If they did, how would they treat a child forced on them by rape?
Could they give it up for adoption?
In the 1930s, ’40s, ’50s and ’60s, if a woman was raped, it was considered to be her own fault. If she had an abortion, many times she was unable to have another child if she lived through the surgery.
Many of those girls were in their teens and had never been told about sex, and had not been given the chance to decide if they wanted a child at such a young age.
I was glad to see Roe v. Wade become law. It prevented a lot of women from having to go through carrying a child to term and having to give it away, or have a back-street abortion, from which many died.
I cannot remember any man going to jail for rape in those days. If men had to go through what women who have been raped go through, they might think differently. In the old days, as well as today, when a young man asks a girl out on a date they usually expect to be repaid, and if the girl gets pregnant, it will always be her fault.
Roe v. Wade should never be canceled. It is critical to the health and well being of all women.
Clayetta H. Speltz
Pueblo
Ms. Speltz has clearly bought into the lie that Roe v Wade is about protecting rape victims.
The logic behind the reversal of Roe v Wade? Simply, 1.3 million unborn children are killed by abortion every year in the US alone. Around 3% of those abortions are reported as following rape. While most rapes go unreported, most rapes don’t result in pregnancy either, so the percentage would not be much higher than 3%. I’m sick of women and men using rape victims as an excuse to keep abortion on demand as law. Roe v Wade is a product of the sexual revolution. It’s not about protecting women, it’s about women being free to have sex without the consequence or responsibility of the baby who results from that sex.
So what happens when Roe is reversed? Women and men will be forced into responsibility when they make the choice to have sex. There will be no more Saturday trips to the abortion clinic, because you forgot to use a rubber, or because you neglected to take your birth control pill for 3 days. You will be forced to think (with your brain) before you act on your urge to copulate.
Don’t think you can control that urge? Then consider yourself as having the same mindset as a rapist, and consider the child you create and kill by abortion, as the victim.
Not to mention Roe v Wade began with perjured rape testimony...
ReplyDeleteYes it was. Roe was/is a farce. It should never has passed through SCOTUS.
DeleteAnother thing they don't mention is that if a woman has been raped at any point in her life, she's a poor candidate for an abortion. When the abortionist goes into her vagina to get at the baby, it can trigger a traumatic flashback to the rape. It doesn't even have to be a rape pregnancy to cause that.
ReplyDeleteMany women who have gotten an abortion after being raped have said it was like being raped all over again. On the other hand, women who've given birth to babies conceived in rape have later said that the baby was the best thing that ever happened to them.
I hadn't heard that Cecilia. Makes sense though.
Delete