I have to admit, the tweet peeked my curiosity. So of course I went to Rachel Maddow's profile. Note the pro-choice propaganda machine, Maddow was re-tweeted at least 100 times.
I clicked on the link, and THIS is what I saw:
Wow, that looks like at least 200 people! And what the heck are they doing at a middle school? Well, closer inspection of the caption reveals that the picture is from a pro-life protest back in Dec. 2010. Not at the middle school as the title of the article would lead pro-aborts to believe, but at late-term abortionist Leroy Carhart's office.
So what happened at the middle school? According to the article:
Antiabortion activists who have sought for months to shut down a Germantown clinic picketed its landlord outside a Montgomery County middle school where his daughter is a student, school and police officials said Monday.Why were the protesters at the school?
A small group of protesters stood outside Robert Frost Middle School in Rockville on Thursday, holding signs and a banner, during back-to-school night, officials said. (emphasis added)
The student’s father, who did not want to be named to protect the safety of his daughter, a sixth-grader at the school, said he saw the five protesters when he went to the school event. (emphasis added)
Some held a large banner that showed his photo, his full name, his phone number and the words “Please STOP the Child Killing.” Others held posters showing aborted fetuses.
Jack Ames, director of a regional antiabortion group called Defend Life, said his group organized the protest at the school because it was a “very good public venue.” Previous demonstrations at the Germantown clinic have been hampered because the clinic is on private property inside an office park. (emphasis added)But you know what? The protest isn't the reason I'm writing this post. This is about the way the pro-choice propaganda wheel turns. I just have to wonder... How many pro-aborts think there were 200 people at that school? My guess is, a lot. And that's sad.
One more thing... "The student’s father, who did not want to be named to protect the safety of his daughter". Guess he changed his mind, as least for Feminists For Choice. (Picture linked to article)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteok, let me try this again.
ReplyDeleteThere is a good example of the same kind of twisting and distortion carried on by pro aborts (albeit more obscure in terms of media exposure) over at the "abortion gang" blog.
An anonymous commenter said this about the gay and lesbian kids in her high school circa: late 70's:
"And the gay guys and lesbians? They were just kids we grew up with. We were sorry they chose the lifestyle they did, because it resulted in the untimely deaths of about 60% of them, from aids and suicide, but they were just kids we grew up with. They didn’t demand to wear dresses to the prom, or shout that they were discriminated against, or require special attention. There was no reason not to like them. We told them to their face they were sinners, and they agreed, and they called us sinners right back, and we agreed. Cause we all knew that we could judge right and wrong, but we weren’t the ultimate judge of someone’s sin."
Which the commenter "Burtie" twisted into this:
"To Anon 1 – I had you pegged as a troll before you ever mentioned abortion. It wasn’t hard, what with the “We told them filthy sinning homosexuals what they were, and we were proud of it. Luckily they all died from AIDS or shame” schtick."
?
Of course, the moderator had already shut down the anonymous commenter because she was being "vitriolic" and "harassing" other writers.
http://abortiongang.org/2011/09/the-biggest-enemy-of-the-catholic-church-is-a-woman-that-thinks-reads-and-votes-on-pro-choice-catholicism/comment-page-1/#comment-5856
Anon - Thanks for posting this info. I will have to read the entire post, comments and all to understand it completely. I'm surprised Steph Herold let a pro-lifer post at all. She is well known for closing the door in pro-lifers faces.
ReplyDeleteAAG -
ReplyDeleteWhat I was witnessing initially from the comments, was a dialog between Lisa and the anon about their experiences in the 70's. Dee came along and "trolled" the comments by picking a fight with the anon based upon her pro life POV. It's certainly a fair discussion when comments like Burtie's continue to be allowed when they can't be answered, eh?
I've read it, those people are so mixed up. I am going to do a post on it, I hope you don't mind. I'm curious. Did you try to comment on it?
ReplyDelete